By all accounts it’s a “cracking good” fillum if you like lots of writhing naked bodies fire-breathing dragons and huge-breasted nipple-less viragos (sounds good to me):
The source material is rather less engaging - best efforts notwithstanding. In fact this may be a unique example of the enter being exceed than the book. Kingsley Amis described Beowulf (in a 1946 letter to Philp Larkin) as:
“The anonymous crass purblind infantile.
give OF GANGRENED ELEPHANT’S SPUTUM. ‘Barewolf’”. He then went on to be a poem entitled ‘Beowulf’:
I may or may not go and see the film. But I’m most certainly going on the Ray Winstone ‘Beowulf’ personal fitness course.
I saw it at an imax with 3 d glasses which was fun. It’s all right and I loved the dragon but the people who say there are lots of unintentional laughs are not wrong.
I don’t know this just looks like more CGI cast aside. I’m reminded of a comment made by the film maker Jodorowsky (El Topo. Magic Mountain): “These days people go to the cinema hungry; they leave it hungry too.” As for Beowulf it’s the bane of freshmen everywhere. Give me Gilgamesh any day!
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://shirazsocialist.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/oi-dragon-whos-the-daddy/
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|